Ok, so, my thought on the matter here is that the holy ghost is an "it".
IF I am correct about what Jesus meant by the Trinity (BIG IF), the the holy ghost would be the social cloud of ideas and words and communications that exists both in and around humanity.
Parts of it are literal humans, or bits of them, or wiggles in the air, or marks in a book, combined with more human parts that translate those written or spoken parts out of where those exist to reify some bit of it.
Some of it is buried in human genetics, in terms of some specific set of traits that when they come together just right, precipitate into a process to make a human with a particular predisposition to autism.
Some of it is buried in the circumstances that lead to a particular set of events that leverages that kind of person into full-blown autism and an interest in pursuing the Wisdom of God above all else.
It is so diffuse, existing in a media so weird and varied, that Jesus and all the others of the ancient world would only be able to see this in terms of "spirituality" and some thing existing outside of nature rather as a "cloud" of natural stuff interacting with other natural stuff.
It is the collective consciousness of people in general, or at least buried somewhere in there.
That stuff doesn't properly have a gender. Arguably given the extreme comorbidly between this particular kind of autism and gender issues, and the fact that gnostics have long thought that
the supreme manifestation of the divine, the complete precipitation of the Holy Spirit itself is a hermaphrodite, I would say they/them or it, depending on whether it's personified.
Uncomfortably, this presents a physical mechanism by which this thing called "the Holy Spirit" has physical existence and reality, something you can, in some moment, point to and say "this is a physical particle of that cloud".
This is what it would be physically.
As to what it contains logically, this would be interpreted within such world views as to specifically be the parts of the larger cloud that encode the realizations people have made about the fact we ought build up the world for each others' sake and for our own,
the emergent logic and structure of agent and goal-oriented action and game theory, and the reasons why we pursue this outcome.
This would in some respects define all individuals who originate these thoughts from first principles "Jesus", and would define whatever aspect of math from which said game theory arises "God the Father".
I don't think calling these things god is appropriate, however this seems to be how the language was used by the original autistic author.
